On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I've often had a conversation like this in the workplace: > > colleague: Let's start a new spring project > me: I hate spring, how about we use Tapestry IOC instead? > colleague: Tapestry, isn't that a web framework? > me: Well... yes, but Tapestry (the web framework) is build on top > of Tapestry IOC which can be used without the web framework > colleague: Oh, I didn't know that.
Maybe we could resurrect the HiveMind name? I always loved that name! > > Does anyone else think that Tapestry IOC should have it's own name? (and > possibly it's own release cycle) HiveMind had its own release cycle; this wasn't quite a disaster, but it made things much more difficult. I really like that in Tapestry you don't need a cheat sheet to figure out which versions of the main libraries work together: they all have the same version number. This means that for some libraries that don't change from release to release you have virtually identical binaries with different version numbers, but that's more than acceptable to me. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-IOC-Should-it-have-it-s-own-name-tp5716228.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
