I've often had a conversation like this in the workplace: colleague: Let's start a new spring project me: I hate spring, how about we use Tapestry IOC instead? colleague: Tapestry, isn't that a web framework? me: Well... yes, but Tapestry (the web framework) is build on top of Tapestry IOC which can be used without the web framework colleague: Oh, I didn't know that.
Does anyone else think that Tapestry IOC should have it's own name? (and possibly it's own release cycle) -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-IOC-Should-it-have-it-s-own-name-tp5716228.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
