Thanks for sharing those. >From the "complete stack" point of view, it clearly exceeds Tapestry, Spring MVC, Seam and most others, but given the aggressive product policy SpringSource/vmware follows with almost everything wrapped in Spring now (yesterday Social Networking, today Android) they have alternatives (most of them Open Source) to many of these components.
Which is most likely, why Oracle bolstered up its "arsenal". Although they have other alternatives and who knows, some day we might even see ATG running on Glassfish [?] On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Katia Aresti <katiaare...@gmail.com> wrote: > I know ATG, I worked with the product for a couple of years, I didn't know > oracle purchased ATG. > > You can not compare ATG with any other fw described by Matt Raidle, neither > Tapestry at all. ATG is a full stack e-commerce solution, portal, > publishing. And not opensource at all, but J2EE standard. There is no point > comparing with Spring fw either. > > ATG is not a webframework, it is built in in his own webframework, own IoC, > own ORM etc ... They even had their own application server, but they moved > to weblogic. All that in order to provide the real functionality you pay > for > : the way to develop really big e-commerce sites. > > well, this is another discussion, it does not really belong to this thread. > > Katia > > > 2010/11/21 Werner Keil <werner.k...@gmail.com> > > > ATG Web Framework, a commercial solution from a company just purchased by > > Oracle. > > > > Some of its features were described as superior to Spring Framework, > which > > its stakeholders clearly deny. > > > > It is not Open Source, but others, especially Seam are. > > >
