voted it. :)

2009/4/14 Ben Gidley <b...@gidley.co.uk>

> I asked on their group and they said raise a bug - so it is raised at
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1283
> So we can wait and see.
>
>
> Ben Gidley
>
> www.gidley.co.uk
> b...@gidley.co.uk
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Christian Edward Gruber <
> christianedwardgru...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The GAE team has indicated on the list that they will be further
> > investigating the non-whitelisted classes towards this end.  I don't want
> to
> > upstage anything officially announced, but rest assured the question of
> what
> > to whitelist is under discussion.  What isn't clear is how fast the
> > particular thing WE want whitelisted will be released, so I would
> seriously
> > look at #1 and #2 until we have some sort of confirmation about #1.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Christian.
> >
> >
> > On 13-Apr-09, at 13:09 , Ben Gidley wrote:
> >
> >  I spent several hours trying to hack around this limitation using the
> >> maven
> >> shade plugin to produce build of woodstox that doesn't reference
> >> javax.xml.stream. I did suceed in this, only to be defeated by an
> internal
> >> method of determining which pull parser to pick as it requires you
> inherit
> >> off javax.xml.stream.
> >> The bad news is it seems to be nearly impossible without changing quite
> a
> >> bit of code.
> >>
> >> So it looks like to 5.1 we have 3 options
> >> - Find/create a Stax implementation (probably the simplest is a patch to
> >> woodstox)  that doesn't depend on javax.xml.stream
> >> - Use an alternative template parser when in google app engine
> >> - Hope that google will let us use these classes!
> >>
> >>
> >> Ben Gidley
> >>
> >> www.gidley.co.uk
> >> b...@gidley.co.uk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Jun Tsai <jun.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>  The main exception:
> >>>
> >>> java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception constructing service
> >>> 'TemplateParser': Error invoking constructor
> >>> org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.TemplateParserImpl(Map,
> >>> boolean) (at TemplateParserImpl.java:50)
> >>> via
> >>>
> org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.InternalModule.bind(ServiceBinder)
> >>> (at InternalModule.java:65) (for service 'TemplateParser'):
> >>> * Could not initialize class
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.stub.javax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory*
> >>>      at
> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.services.JustInTimeObjectCreator.obtainObjectFromCreator(JustInTimeObjectCreator.java:78)
> >>>      at
> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.services.JustInTimeObjectCreator.createObject(JustInTimeObjectCreator.java:57)
> >>>      at
> >>> $TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.delegate($TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.java)
> >>>      at
> >>>
> >>>
> $TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.parseTemplate($TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.java)
> >>>      at
> >>>
> >>>
> org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.ComponentTemplateSourceImpl.parseTemplate(ComponentTemplateSourceImpl.java:151)
> >>>
> >>> I think the red line is main reason.
> >>>
> >>> 2009/4/13 Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>  I chose Stax because parsing using SAX had gotten so complicated that
> >>>> it was hard to add the many new features I wanted in 5.1.  Anythings
> >>>> possible, but I'd like to see how flexible the GAE people are in terms
> >>>> of opening up the STAX API.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Christian Edward Gruber
> >>>> <christianedwardgru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> It's the stax dependency on javax.xml.stream for the moment.  Howard,
> >>>>>
> >>>> any
> >>>
> >>>> thoughts about having an alternate template processor?  It's injected,
> >>>>>
> >>>> so
> >>>
> >>>> would that be feasible?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Christian.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 13-Apr-09, at 11:10 , dwi ardi irawan wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  wow, cool....how bout tapestry 5.1 ? any progress so far ? just
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> curious...
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> http://dwiardiirawan.blogspot.com
> >>>>>> "cos everyone could be extraordinary...lighten up !"
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Christian Edward Gruber
> >>>>> e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com
> >>>>> weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >>>>
> >>>> Creator of Apache Tapestry
> >>>> Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> regards,
> >>> Jun Tsai
> >>>
> >>>
> > Christian Edward Gruber
> > e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com
> > weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >
> >
>



-- 
regards,
Jun Tsai

Reply via email to