voted for it! :)

Am Montag 13 April 2009 19:23:34 schrieb Ben Gidley:
> I asked on their group and they said raise a bug - so it is raised at
> http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1283
> So we can wait and see.
>
>
> Ben Gidley
>
> www.gidley.co.uk
> b...@gidley.co.uk
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Christian Edward Gruber <
>
> christianedwardgru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The GAE team has indicated on the list that they will be further
> > investigating the non-whitelisted classes towards this end.  I don't want
> > to upstage anything officially announced, but rest assured the question
> > of what to whitelist is under discussion.  What isn't clear is how fast
> > the particular thing WE want whitelisted will be released, so I would
> > seriously look at #1 and #2 until we have some sort of confirmation about
> > #1.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Christian.
> >
> >
> > On 13-Apr-09, at 13:09 , Ben Gidley wrote:
> >
> >  I spent several hours trying to hack around this limitation using the
> >
> >> maven
> >> shade plugin to produce build of woodstox that doesn't reference
> >> javax.xml.stream. I did suceed in this, only to be defeated by an
> >> internal method of determining which pull parser to pick as it requires
> >> you inherit off javax.xml.stream.
> >> The bad news is it seems to be nearly impossible without changing quite
> >> a bit of code.
> >>
> >> So it looks like to 5.1 we have 3 options
> >> - Find/create a Stax implementation (probably the simplest is a patch to
> >> woodstox)  that doesn't depend on javax.xml.stream
> >> - Use an alternative template parser when in google app engine
> >> - Hope that google will let us use these classes!
> >>
> >>
> >> Ben Gidley
> >>
> >> www.gidley.co.uk
> >> b...@gidley.co.uk
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Jun Tsai <jun.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>  The main exception:
> >>> java.lang.RuntimeException: Exception constructing service
> >>> 'TemplateParser': Error invoking constructor
> >>> org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.TemplateParserImpl(Map,
> >>> boolean) (at TemplateParserImpl.java:50)
> >>> via
> >>> org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.InternalModule.bind(ServiceBinde
> >>>r) (at InternalModule.java:65) (for service 'TemplateParser'):
> >>> * Could not initialize class
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> com.google.apphosting.runtime.security.shared.stub.javax.xml.stream.XML
> >>>InputFactory* at
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.services.JustInTimeObjectCreator.obta
> >>>inObjectFromCreator(JustInTimeObjectCreator.java:78) at
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.services.JustInTimeObjectCreator.crea
> >>>teObject(JustInTimeObjectCreator.java:57) at
> >>> $TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.delegate($TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.java)
> >>>      at
> >>>
> >>> $TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.parseTemplate($TemplateParser_120a00c1dda.j
> >>>ava) at
> >>>
> >>> org.apache.tapestry5.internal.services.ComponentTemplateSourceImpl.pars
> >>>eTemplate(ComponentTemplateSourceImpl.java:151)
> >>>
> >>> I think the red line is main reason.
> >>>
> >>> 2009/4/13 Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>  I chose Stax because parsing using SAX had gotten so complicated that
> >>>
> >>>> it was hard to add the many new features I wanted in 5.1.  Anythings
> >>>> possible, but I'd like to see how flexible the GAE people are in terms
> >>>> of opening up the STAX API.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Christian Edward Gruber
> >>>>
> >>>> <christianedwardgru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> It's the stax dependency on javax.xml.stream for the moment.  Howard,
> >>>>
> >>>> any
> >>>>
> >>>> thoughts about having an alternate template processor?  It's injected,
> >>>>
> >>>> so
> >>>>
> >>>> would that be feasible?
> >>>>
> >>>>> Christian.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 13-Apr-09, at 11:10 , dwi ardi irawan wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  wow, cool....how bout tapestry 5.1 ? any progress so far ? just
> >>>>>
> >>>>> curious...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> http://dwiardiirawan.blogspot.com
> >>>>>> "cos everyone could be extraordinary...lighten up !"
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Christian Edward Gruber
> >>>>> e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com
> >>>>> weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Howard M. Lewis Ship
> >>>>
> >>>> Creator of Apache Tapestry
> >>>> Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> regards,
> >>> Jun Tsai
> >
> > Christian Edward Gruber
> > e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com
> > weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to