I chose Stax because parsing using SAX had gotten so complicated that it was hard to add the many new features I wanted in 5.1. Anythings possible, but I'd like to see how flexible the GAE people are in terms of opening up the STAX API.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Christian Edward Gruber <christianedwardgru...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's the stax dependency on javax.xml.stream for the moment. Howard, any > thoughts about having an alternate template processor? It's injected, so > would that be feasible? > > Christian. > > On 13-Apr-09, at 11:10 , dwi ardi irawan wrote: > >> wow, cool....how bout tapestry 5.1 ? any progress so far ? just curious... >> >> >> -- >> http://dwiardiirawan.blogspot.com >> "cos everyone could be extraordinary...lighten up !" > > Christian Edward Gruber > e-mail: christianedwardgru...@gmail.com > weblog: http://www.geekinasuit.com/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
