Fernando Padilla wrote:
We use YUI ourselves. What ever happened to the concept of pluggable
javascript implementations?
So people can choose what underlying javascript system to use?
I believe that this is the core problem : whatever the JS framework
chosen, there will be happy/unhappy people with the choice.
SO, as far as I can see, there is two main options for Howard :
- provide a Tapestry js plugable API, as expressed by Fernando and in
the bug: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-93, so everybody may
use what he wants. It certainly will be a more difficult solution than
the actual one ;
- just use the framework he likes the most - as long as it does the job...
Well, perhaps I'm really not the best one to talk about JS frameworks -
I have a kind a hate/hum... hate relation with JS, so take this opinion
with care :)
--
Francois Armand
Etudes & Développements J2EE
Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com
Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28
-----------
http://fanf42.blogspot.com
InterLDAP - http://interldap.org
FederID - http://www.federid.org/
Open Source identities management and federation
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
