Yura Tkachenko wrote:
I hope after reading my post you won't add me to this page - http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Trolls I really want to defend Rob :-) Since some of his points are real problems of Tapestry. I will say it again: backward compatibility. Of course major releases shouldn't be compatible, i.e. 1.0 version not necessary compatible with 2.0. But 1.0 should be compatible with 1.1. But at the same time T4 wasn't compatible with T3 and T4 is not compatible with T5.
And why your hypothetical 1.0 need not to be compatible with 2.0, whereas just because Tapestry 4.0 is not compatible with 5.0 you feel like defending someone deliberately insulting Howard?
Of course, in the real world nobody does fully backwards compatibility, every time we have issues during migrating to new version of some product. Even JDK 1.5 not fully backwards compatible with JDK 1.4.
Exactly: so why do you blame Tapestry? Angelo. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
