An ASO is an application state object.  ASOs are created on demand, and
shared between pages.  ASOs are generally stored in the HttpSession.

A client ASO would be all that, but would be stored on the client (inside
hidden form fields or query parameters). This has some costs: serializing
the objects, and the question of security.


On 9/27/07, Anton Gavazuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry for interruption  :) - what is Client-side ASO?
>
>
> 2007/9/27, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Client-side page persistence is in there, I'l have to check if it is
> > documented. Client-side ASOs are not there yet (and there is not yet a
> > JIRA
> > issue to implement them).
> >
> > On 9/27/07, kranga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The one feature that T5 is missing and keeps us in T3 is lack of
> support
> > > for
> > > client-side session persistence. With the redirect-after-submit
> paradigm
> > > ingrained in T5 (a design decision I think a framework shouldn't be
> > > making),
> > > I can't have state hidden in forms persisted through the redirect and
> > > hence
> > > am forced to use the session.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Francois Armand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Tapestry users" <users@tapestry.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 4:24 AM
> > > Subject: Re: Comparison
> > >
> > >
> > > > Christian Gorbach wrote:
> > > >> Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong:
> > > >>
> > >
> http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html
> > > >> cheers
> > > >> c)hristian
> > > >>
> > > > (I'm sorry, I would have answer on your blog, but it seems that
> > > something
> > > > does not work with typekey login, I get a error message : "The site
> > > you're
> > > > trying to comment on has not signed up for this feature. Please
> inform
> > > the
> > > > site owner.")
> > > >
> > > > Well, I mostly agree with the major part of your post, except for
> the
> > > ease
> > > > of use : a few month ago, I has to choose a new web framework and
> > tested
> > > > wicket (1.3, first betas) and Tapestry 5. And I found Tapestry 5 far
> > > > simpler to understand and use than Wicket, with no possible
> comparison
> > !
> > > >
> > > > So, perhaps previous version of Tapestry used to be hard, but
> Tapestry
> > 5
> > > > is just the simplest Java web framework that I ever used (note: this
> > > > assertion really depends of my personal background, the fact that I
> > > never
> > > > code any line of Swing but I know Spring/IoC for a long time, and
> that
> > I
> > > > only spend some time with Struts, Struts 2, Stripes, Wicket and
> > Tapestry
> > > > 5).
> > > >
> > > > Really, Tapestry 5 has a lot of default, the bigger one being that
> > it's
> > > > still alpha, but it *is* simple.  Being productive with it is a
> matter
> > > of
> > > > minutes...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Francois Armand
> > > > Etudes & Développements J2EE
> > > > Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com
> > > > Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28
> > > > -----------
> > > > InterLDAP - http://interldap.org FederID - http://www.federid.org/
> > > > Open Source identities management and federation
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > Partner and Senior Architect at Feature50
> >
> > Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind
> >
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Partner and Senior Architect at Feature50

Creator Apache Tapestry and Apache HiveMind

Reply via email to