One objective and undisputable benefit of any version of Tapestry over JSF is that in Tapestry you can create custom controls very easily, and so you have plenty of freedom in designing your interfaces.
Everything else is arguable. You cannot compare frameworks without specifying some set of criteria. What is most important to you? Productivity? Learning curve? Effective collaboration of designers and developers? IMHO Tapestry 5 is easy to learn. I hope my book, to be published soon, will prove this ;) -----Original Message----- From: Borut Bolcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 September 2007 14:53 To: Tapestry Subject: Comparison Hello, has anyone done a fair comparison of T5, JSF (any incarnation), Wicket or/and any other Java web framework. I have WebObjects background and some T4 demo apps. I read Neil Ford's "Art Of Java Web Development" a book a while ago, but it is outdated now. Still, it has guidelines for web frameworks evaluation criteria. I do have a good gut feeling about T5, but it will take more than that to choose it as a new front end technology for our company. Can you please expose strengths and weaknesses of T5 and other players in enterprise environment. Just drop a plus and minus for one or two features. Regards, Borut ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail at the address shown. This email transmission may contain confidential information. This information is intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is intended even if addressed incorrectly. Please delete it from your files if you are not the intended recipient. Thank you for your compliance. Copyright 2007 CIGNA ============================================================================== --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
