Christian Gorbach wrote:
Here's a recent comparison of Wicket and Tap from Ken Tong:
http://agileskills2.org/blog/2007/09/my_thoughts_on_the_differences.html
cheers
c)hristian
(I'm sorry, I would have answer on your blog, but it seems that
something does not work with typekey login, I get a error message : "The
site you're trying to comment on has not signed up for this feature.
Please inform the site owner.")
Well, I mostly agree with the major part of your post, except for the
ease of use : a few month ago, I has to choose a new web framework and
tested wicket (1.3, first betas) and Tapestry 5. And I found Tapestry 5
far simpler to understand and use than Wicket, with no possible
comparison !
So, perhaps previous version of Tapestry used to be hard, but Tapestry 5
is just the simplest Java web framework that I ever used (note: this
assertion really depends of my personal background, the fact that I
never code any line of Swing but I know Spring/IoC for a long time, and
that I only spend some time with Struts, Struts 2, Stripes, Wicket and
Tapestry 5).
Really, Tapestry 5 has a lot of default, the bigger one being that it's
still alpha, but it *is* simple. Being productive with it is a matter
of minutes...
--
Francois Armand
Etudes & Développements J2EE
Groupe Linagora - http://www.linagora.com
Tél.: +33 (0)1 58 18 68 28
-----------
InterLDAP - http://interldap.org
FederID - http://www.federid.org/
Open Source identities management and federation
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
