Maven is very much like Windows and Project Wizards -
does work fine till we need something slightly
different than "they" think we would need. 

For example I think that:
Much praised transitive dependencies in Maven 2 is
simply abomination because it makes build dependent 
on repository content. I mean that that exactly the
same pom can create different deliverables with
different content, or one build will be successful and
another will not. This is happening because of version
ranges for dependencies and lack of explicit control
over them paired with simple to use update tool. 

http://www.bileblog.org/?p=59


--- Renat Zubairov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I would disagree. Maven (especially version 2) is a
> very nice
> framework that really simplify project structure and
> development
> practices. It has some issues in the dynamic
> projects like tapestry5
> but in general it works very well (which is
> reflected by the number of
> projects build by maven).
> 
> I'm quite happy that Tapestry is build using maven2.
> 
> Renat
> 
> On 27/03/07, Konstantin Ignatyev
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Good catch.
> >
> > Maven has good idea behind but not too good
> > implementation :) I think that inventor of Jelly
> > simply can not produce anything useable :(
> >
> > I wish Howard used good-old Ant + Ivy for
> dependency
> > management and publishing: just a bit more work
> > initially but them it all just works...
> >
> > --- Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is it me, or is the amount of maven related
> posts
> > > steadily growing????
> > >
> > > I hope T5 will not be dependent on Maven, or
> will
> > > it?
> > >
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Konstantin Ignatyev
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth,
> humans will add fifteen million tons of carbon to
> the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of tropical
> rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert,
> eliminate between forty to one hundred species,
> erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil, add 2,700
> tons of CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their
> population by 263,000
> >
> > Bowers, C.A.  The Culture of Denial:  Why the
> Environmental Movement Needs a Strategy for
> Reforming Universities and Public Schools.  New
> York:  State University of New York Press, 1997: (4)
> (5) (p.206)
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Renat Zubairov
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


Konstantin Ignatyev




PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen million 
tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of tropical 
rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate between forty to one 
hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil, add 2,700 tons of 
CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population by 263,000

Bowers, C.A.  The Culture of Denial:  Why the Environmental Movement Needs a 
Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools.  New York:  State 
University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to