Well, that's just because I've had no real answer from any of you.
The T5 manual goes into great detail as to how Maven should be used
in creating a Tapestry application, Howard Screencast #3 is describing
how Maven is used in Tapestry development. His blogs mentions a bunch
of stuff related to Maven. All of this to me looks like Maven is playing
a vital role in the way T5 should be used.
Maybe I should restate my question (and show you that I am sincere and
by no means are trying to bully any of you):
So here goes:
What if I don't want to use Maven, or the project/company that is hiring me
doesn't allow me to use Maven - can I still use T5?
and...
If I'm not using Maven, what are the features of T5 I am missing out on?
Hope this makes things clearer,
Thank you.
-J.
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
It only feels redundant because you already have your answer. It's
self describing. You can do whatever you can do today. Is make a
requirement for c++ development? I just don't understand your
question.
if you want to develop the actual framework code it's probably a
requirement. If not, I don't know. It's what it used to be before. You
can download each official release like everyone else.
For some reason your question feels a little bit like bullying. I've
seen you ask it now at least 10-20 times on this mailing list and on
Howard's blog. I think you've asked it enough.
On 3/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
C'mon - Since T5 is a single man effort (or at least that's what it says
at the Maven project info ;-) - we
as users of Tapestry have right to know whether Maven will be a
requirement in our every day work or
not.
To me the thing that is annoying is seeing more and more Maven related
threads in the maillist, whereas
this list should be about developing with the great Tapestry framework.
Do you really feel that this is that redundant, than simply state (or
let the creator of Tapestry state)
that Maven will not be a requirement for developing *with* Tapestry and
I can go about my business.
Thanks,
-J.
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> What do you really expect Howard to say that you didn't read in TSS
> link posted earlier in this thread?
>
> At this point this conversation is redundant and annoying. Everyone is
> free to develop their software however they like, please allow us the
> same courtesy.
>
> On 3/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Howard, please... respond.
>> -J.
>>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Cumquat Information Technology
De Dreef 19
3706 BR Zeist
T +31 (0)30 - 6940490
F +31 (0)30 - 6940499
W http://www.cumquat.nl
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M +31 6 51 169 556
B http://www.cumquat.nl/technology_atom10.xml
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
