If your company doesn't allow using maven then you can download Tapestry like anyone else:
http://tapestry.apache.org/download.html Other than that you'll be missing out on all of the archetypes / snapshot updates / etc. ...You can go find out more about that at : http://maven.apache.org Yes - we're using maven for development because it makes our lives easier. We're not here to sell you on using / not using maven though. If you are really curious though, like I said ...Go read the manual. ;) On 3/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, that's just because I've had no real answer from any of you. The T5 manual goes into great detail as to how Maven should be used in creating a Tapestry application, Howard Screencast #3 is describing how Maven is used in Tapestry development. His blogs mentions a bunch of stuff related to Maven. All of this to me looks like Maven is playing a vital role in the way T5 should be used. Maybe I should restate my question (and show you that I am sincere and by no means are trying to bully any of you): So here goes: What if I don't want to use Maven, or the project/company that is hiring me doesn't allow me to use Maven - can I still use T5? and... If I'm not using Maven, what are the features of T5 I am missing out on? Hope this makes things clearer, Thank you. -J. Jesse Kuhnert wrote: > It only feels redundant because you already have your answer. It's > self describing. You can do whatever you can do today. Is make a > requirement for c++ development? I just don't understand your > question. > > if you want to develop the actual framework code it's probably a > requirement. If not, I don't know. It's what it used to be before. You > can download each official release like everyone else. > > For some reason your question feels a little bit like bullying. I've > seen you ask it now at least 10-20 times on this mailing list and on > Howard's blog. I think you've asked it enough. > > On 3/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> C'mon - Since T5 is a single man effort (or at least that's what it says >> at the Maven project info ;-) - we >> as users of Tapestry have right to know whether Maven will be a >> requirement in our every day work or >> not. >> >> To me the thing that is annoying is seeing more and more Maven related >> threads in the maillist, whereas >> this list should be about developing with the great Tapestry framework. >> >> Do you really feel that this is that redundant, than simply state (or >> let the creator of Tapestry state) >> that Maven will not be a requirement for developing *with* Tapestry and >> I can go about my business. >> >> Thanks, >> -J. >> >> Jesse Kuhnert wrote: >> > What do you really expect Howard to say that you didn't read in TSS >> > link posted earlier in this thread? >> > >> > At this point this conversation is redundant and annoying. Everyone is >> > free to develop their software however they like, please allow us the >> > same courtesy. >> > >> > On 3/28/07, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Howard, please... respond. >> >> -J. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > -- Cumquat Information Technology De Dreef 19 3706 BR Zeist T +31 (0)30 - 6940490 F +31 (0)30 - 6940499 W http://www.cumquat.nl E [EMAIL PROTECTED] M +31 6 51 169 556 B http://www.cumquat.nl/technology_atom10.xml --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
