I think people are misunderstanding. It's not a spamd service. It's basically another rule you would add to your config.

I think I need to do it first and then talk about it.

On 09/22/17 09:33, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
It's very feasible but it's a blurry off topic issue to even discuss here for a commercial service.

At worst you just make yourself a standard mx of record filter system provider.

If you want a "plugin" you just offer spamd service restricted by ip address with ssl.

Perhaps you are over thinking things? Just offer a complete spamd replacement instead of an extra test.

My $0.02.
Regards,
KAM

On September 22, 2017 12:17:04 PM EDT, Marc Perkel <supp...@junkemailfilter.com> wrote:

    Probably both. Not sure. Just trying to see if it's feasible.

    On 09/22/17 09:12, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
    Are you discussing a free or a commercial service?
    Regards,
    KAM

    On September 22, 2017 11:40:50 AM EDT, Marc Perkel
    <supp...@junkemailfilter.com> wrote:

        This is something I'm thinking about doing - providing a service that
        integrates into SA as a plug in and communicates with my servers to
        return a useful score enhancer.

        If there is interest my initial demo test will be just stuffing the
        subject line into a IP/port and returning a number where positive is
        spam and negative is ham. This would just be a proof of concept.

        The next level would be sending the message headers and eventually - the
        full message.

        Would need someone to write a simple plugin - not a perl guy - but how
        hard can that be? Would eventually need to be encrypted though.

        Starting with just the subject won't return a result all the time. Many
        request will return a 0 if it can't figure it out. If it does return a
        result that is significantly away from 0 it's probably right. And it is
        more likely to return a result from ham than spam confirming good email
        as good. Obviously - using the header and then the whole message will be
        more accurate.

        I'm using new techniques no one else is using.

        So - any interest?


-- Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
    supp...@junkemailfilter.com
    http://www.junkemailfilter.com
    Junk Email Filter dot com
    415-992-3400


--
Marc Perkel - Sales/Support
supp...@junkemailfilter.com
http://www.junkemailfilter.com
Junk Email Filter dot com
415-992-3400

Reply via email to