On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 08:40 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote: > This is something I'm thinking about doing - providing a service > that integrates into SA as a plug in and communicates with my servers > to return a useful score enhancer. > > If there is interest my initial demo test will be just stuffing the > subject line into a IP/port and returning a number where positive is > spam and negative is ham. This would just be a proof of concept. > > The next level would be sending the message headers and eventually - > the full message. > How does this differ from running spamc with the -d or --dest option?
These options make it send the message to a daemonised spamd on one of the host(s) listed in the -d or --dest option's value string, so this already offers a fail-over capability. Seen in this light, spamc already does pretty much what I think you're asking for. Martin
