It's very feasible but it's a blurry off topic issue to even discuss here for a commercial service.
At worst you just make yourself a standard mx of record filter system provider. If you want a "plugin" you just offer spamd service restricted by ip address with ssl. Perhaps you are over thinking things? Just offer a complete spamd replacement instead of an extra test. My $0.02. Regards, KAM On September 22, 2017 12:17:04 PM EDT, Marc Perkel <supp...@junkemailfilter.com> wrote: >Probably both. Not sure. Just trying to see if it's feasible. > >On 09/22/17 09:12, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: >> Are you discussing a free or a commercial service? >> Regards, >> KAM >> >> On September 22, 2017 11:40:50 AM EDT, Marc Perkel >> <supp...@junkemailfilter.com> wrote: >> >> This is something I'm thinking about doing - providing a service >that >> integrates into SA as a plug in and communicates with my servers >to >> return a useful score enhancer. >> >> If there is interest my initial demo test will be just stuffing >the >> subject line into a IP/port and returning a number where positive >is >> spam and negative is ham. This would just be a proof of concept. >> >> The next level would be sending the message headers and >eventually - the >> full message. >> >> Would need someone to write a simple plugin - not a perl guy - >but how >> hard can that be? Would eventually need to be encrypted though. >> >> Starting with just the subject won't return a result all the >time. Many >> request will return a 0 if it can't figure it out. If it does >return a >> result that is significantly away from 0 it's probably right. And >it is >> more likely to return a result from ham than spam confirming good >email >> as good. Obviously - using the header and then the whole message >will be >> more accurate. >> >> I'm using new techniques no one else is using. >> >> So - any interest? >> > >-- >Marc Perkel - Sales/Support >supp...@junkemailfilter.com >http://www.junkemailfilter.com >Junk Email Filter dot com >415-992-3400
