On 08/06/16 11:28, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 08.06.2016 um 12:15 schrieb Antony Stone:
>> On Wednesday 08 June 2016 at 11:54:07, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> Am 08.06.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Michael H:
>>>
>>>> I am a member of many mailing lists and your actions would have
>>>> caused you
>>>> to be removed on all of the others by now.
>>>
>>> compared with some other *really* personal attacks i got on this list
>>> harmless
>>
>> I don't believe this comment was intended as any sort of personal
>> attack, so
>> there's no need to interpret it as one.
> 
> where did i say that?
> where did i talk about this comment?
> 
> i talked about countless attacks like
> https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg91823.html
> or
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/201411.mbox/%3cCAMD-=VLKStiPb_6NCn5EY7sNhJO7eAKE9dPpUEffHhH9xM_w=a...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> to only name two examples
> 
> i compared just my posting style with personal attacks (indepedent of
> any topic) i got from people on this list up to insinuate that i lie
> until i could prove that exactly what i said in fact happens on a
> technical level
> 
>> There are in fact people who don't go around doing that sort of thing
>> as a
>> matter of course.
>>
>> The point I believe Michael was making is simply that several people
>> here do
>> not like your rudeness, in much the same way as you appear not to like
>> people's ignorance when they ask questions.
> 
> then he could start as many others not call me by family name because
> *that* is rude where i come from

I meant no offense, I simply copied the first name. You taking that as a
'attack' is another example of your intolerance.

> 
>> Your expertise is valued, but your attitude for conveying it is not.
>>
>> We (I get the impression there are several people here of a similar
>> opinion)
>> are simply asking you to be more polite and pleasant to people in your
>> communications.  It is simply good manners, especially in a public forum
> 
> well, he explained me i could just ignore messages if they take too much
> time because the asking guy don't provide any useful infroamtions befpre
> the fifth mail-ping-pong
> 
> i don#t get why he can't do the same?
> 

I do ignore messages that can clearly be answered by google, this seems
to rile you up and cause you to be rude without cause.

Have a great day Harald.

Reply via email to