On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:59:57 +0100 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 18.11.15 22:36, RW wrote:
> >That suggests that the SPF header and the > >Received header are in the opposite order in the milter copy > >compared with the final delivered version. > > From what I know, the locally added Received: header is not visible > in milter and the spamass-milter must fake it. Therefore, if > Received-SPF exists, the Received: is prepended before it, which > explains the issue. In that case it might be a good idea to search all headers when use_newest_received_spf_header is set.
