I meant to say spamassasin IN a milter architecture. I understand your point.
On 11/19/2015 14:43, Axb wrote: > On 11/19/2015 01:29 PM, Elod G wrote: >> spamassassin as a milter architecture > > SpamAssassin is not a milter. > > spamass-milter is third party , rather dated. > > If you need to handle filtering with SA during the SMTP sessions there > are probably more adequate/compatible/supported options.
