On 03.07.2015 15:00, Alex wrote:
Hi,
tried iXhash? (I assume you're also using Razor)
I am using Razor, but is iXhash still being developed and used in
production? It appears the last development was in 2013, and their
website has dead links...
I would hardly suggest using something which is dead....
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ixhash/
see "User Reviews" :
There is a newer (inofficial) plugin at mailfud.org/iXhash2/ Recommended by
original author at:
www.heise.de/ix/foren/S-iXHash-Plugin-ein-paar-Empfehlungen/forum-48292/msg-22474602/read/
Yes, apologies; I didn't mean to suggest that. I'll have to take your
word for it since the page is in German, but will check it out.
ever heard of translate.google.com
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=www.heise.de%2Fix%2Fforen%2FS-iXHash-Plugin-ein-paar-Empfehlungen%2Fforum-48292%2Fmsg-22474602%2Fread%2F&edit-text=&act=url
may not be perfect but one gets the meaning
Surprisingly to me, neither URL referenced in the samples
(auction.greendust.com and ubidibid.com) have yet to be added to a
blacklist, which to me means they either just haven't yet been added,
or the links are some kind of hacked accounts that redirect to another
site.
if BL traps/feeds don't see a hacked site's URL/spam sample they can't list
it.
Yes, of course; I was more or less just commenting that it was weird
to apparently be one of the few seeing this. I've already added them
to my local RBL.
It also means that Razor, and ixhash, would suffer in a similar way
with this one...
not necessarily, they all have different sources...
not all sources see the same traffic...
