Am 02.07.2015 um 23:40 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
RW skrev den 2015-07-02 23:21:On Thu, 02 Jul 2015 19:21:12 +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:John Hardin skrev den 2015-07-02 19:08: >> # if version >3.3.x >> blacklist_uri_hosts co.uk > > That seems to be a rather big hammer you're recommending. Of course, > if you don't do any business with anyone in the UK (and don't ever > intend to) it may be reasonable. co.dk was dropped before it got populary, i dont like to se tlds that try to force nic to sell less,I'm not sure what you are trying to say here, but direct .uk domains have only been available for a year, and .uk and .co.uk are both managed by Nominet.whitelist_uri_hosts example.co.uk but imho none asked if i whitelisted
it don't matter at all
the issue i pointed out is that why get domains payed on a non tld ?, or is co.uk really a tld ?, co.dk is not
in other words: you have no clue what you are talking about and bring examples which would lead straight to hell if anybody starts using them
that's fine in general, but than don't recommend things https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-level_domain
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
