On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 02/07/2015 04:50, John Hardin a écrit :
> Is there supposed to be an existing FUZZY_DETAILS rule?
I don't think so.
If you were to envisage such a rule, it's worth noting that it would almost
certainly need a special case to avoid FPs on genuine French "détails" with
an acute accent. There could conceivably be other potential FPs in other
languages too, of course.
True. It wouldn't be a poison-pill rule by any means.
I haven't looked up the Unicode that's used in the spample, could
that be what they've done there?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maxim IV: Close air support covereth a multitude of sins.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 days until the 239th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
