Am 05.03.2015 um 21:34 schrieb RW:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:08:14 -0500 Kevin A. McGrail wrote:On 3/5/2015 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:according to spamc --help "-R" and "--full" is the same in fact in case of a ham-message only -R works as expected --full behaves identical zu --full-spam -r, --full-spam Print full report for messages identified as spam. -R, --full Print full report for all messages. ____________________________ BROKEN: /usr/bin/spamc --full --port=10029 < sample.eml OK: /usr/bin/spamc R --port=10029 < sample.emlThe spamc code seems to concur -R and --full are the same option: { "full", no_argument, 0, 'R' } Looking in the code, nothing jumps out as a logic issue but testing on my command line with ham shows problems spamc -R -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/1 <Incorrectly starts with the score/threshold which could just be a documentation issue and then the report>That's what the documentation does say IMO: -R, --full ... See -r for details of the output format used. -r, --full-spam Just output the SpamAssassin report text to stdout, if .... The first line of the output is the message score and the threshold, in this format: score/threshold
my problem is that it don't output anything while -R does and in case of spam it would - so '--full; behaves *identical* to -r instead to -R
BTW: it would be nice not have that "Content preview"[root@mail-gw:~]$ su -c "/usr/bin/spamc --full -l -s 20000000 -d 127.0.0.1 -p 10029 < /var/lib/spamass-milter/test/6.eml" - sa-milt
results in no outout at all _______________________________________________________ expected result[root@mail-gw:~]$ su -c "/usr/bin/spamc -R -l -s 20000000 -d 127.0.0.1 -p 10029 < /var/lib/spamass-milter/test/6.eml" - sa-milt
2.0/5.0 Spam detection software, running on the system "mail-gw.thelounge.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] _______________________________________________________ fine, that's a junk message and so it don't matter[root@mail-gw:~]$ su -c "/usr/bin/spamc --full -l -s 20000000 -d 127.0.0.1 -p 10029 < /var/lib/spamass-milter/test/5.eml" - sa-milt
Spam detection software, running on the system "mail-gw.thelounge.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [...] Content analysis details: (7.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
7.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 1.0000] 0.4 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100% [score: 1.0000]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature