On 3/5/2015 3:34 PM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:08:14 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/5/2015 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
according to spamc --help "-R" and "--full" is the same
in fact in case of a ham-message only -R works as expected
--full behaves identical zu --full-spam
-r, --full-spam Print full report for messages identified as
spam. -R, --full Print full report for all messages.
____________________________
BROKEN: /usr/bin/spamc --full --port=10029 < sample.eml
OK: /usr/bin/spamc R --port=10029 < sample.eml
The spamc code seems to concur -R and --full are the same option:
{ "full", no_argument, 0, 'R' }
Looking in the code, nothing jumps out as a logic issue but testing
on my command line with ham shows problems
spamc -R -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/1
<Incorrectly starts with the score/threshold which could just be a
documentation issue and then the report>
That's what the documentation does say IMO:
I missed the
See -r for details of the output format used.
but either way I'm not always getting score/threshold either.
