On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 14:08:14 -0500
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 3/5/2015 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > according to spamc --help "-R" and "--full" is the same
> > in fact in case of a ham-message only -R works as expected
> > --full behaves identical zu --full-spam
> >
> > -r, --full-spam Print full report for messages identified as
> > spam. -R, --full Print full report for all messages.
> > ____________________________
> >
> > BROKEN: /usr/bin/spamc --full --port=10029 < sample.eml
> > OK: /usr/bin/spamc R --port=10029 < sample.eml
> >
>
> The spamc code seems to concur -R and --full are the same option:
>
> { "full", no_argument, 0, 'R' }
>
> Looking in the code, nothing jumps out as a logic issue but testing
> on my command line with ham shows problems
>
> spamc -R -d spamd.pccc.com < /tmp/1
> <Incorrectly starts with the score/threshold which could just be a
> documentation issue and then the report>
That's what the documentation does say IMO:
-R, --full
...
See -r for details of the output format used.
-r, --full-spam
Just output the SpamAssassin report text to stdout, if ....
The first line of the output is the message score and the
threshold, in this format:
score/threshold
