On 11/30/2014 11:29 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Would a corrected syntax version of this work?
if version > 3.004001 && perl_version >= 5.010000
body NON_588_COMPATIBLE_RE_SYNTAX /\w++/
endif
Yes. That *does* work.
Thank you! I think you just solved it.
Define work...
-----------
if version > 3.004001 && perl_version >= 5.010000
body NON_588_COMPATIBLE_RE_SYNTAX /\w++/
endif
# spamassassin --lint
Dec 1 15:03:50.365 [28224] warn: Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric
in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 2520) line 2.
----------
-----------
if version > 3.004001
if perl_version >= 5.010000
body NON_588_COMPATIBLE_RE_SYNTAX /\w++/
endif
endif
# spamassassin --lint
Dec 1 15:04:29.115 [28226] warn: Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric
in numeric ge (>=) at (eval 2521) line 2.
-----------
(SA 3.3.1 / perl 5.8.8)
But I was thinking another solution to the problem;
Since there already are quite a few changes to 3.4(+) (quite a few
checking for version >= 3.004000 in the rulesets)
How difficult would it be to split 3.4.1(+) rulesets from pre-3.4.1
rulesets? Older SA/sa-update would then fetch rulesets without the
new checks, and new sa-update would benefit from the new checks...
just my $.02
--
Bernt 'Burnie' Pettersen /// DoD#2345
<E-mail:bur...@dod.no> /// <URL:http://burnie.sh/>
- Creative brains need creative workhours! -
