On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.09.2014 um 16:50 schrieb Jose Borges Ferreira:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
something is here terrible wrong
why does "average" is preferred over "excellent"
why do H3 and H4 get a very less WL score?
recently a clear spam message slipped by the -1.7 through
describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 Average reputation (+2)
describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 Good reputation (+3)
describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 Very Good reputation (+4)
describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Excellent reputation (+5)
score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -1.772 0.001 -1.772
score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010
score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010
score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 -1.000 0.001 -1.000
__________________________________________________
Thats probably the QA system that scores that based on the available
corpus data ..
so received nightly with sa-update?
Yep.
It's possible that these scores should be static.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
How can you reason with someone who thinks we're on a glidepath to
a police state and yet their solution is to grant the government a
monopoly on force? They are insane.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: the 13rd anniversary of 9/11
