Am 10.09.2014 um 16:50 schrieb Jose Borges Ferreira: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> > wrote: >> something is here terrible wrong >> >> why does "average" is preferred over "excellent" >> why do H3 and H4 get a very less WL score? >> recently a clear spam message slipped by the -1.7 through >> >> describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 Average reputation (+2) >> describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 Good reputation (+3) >> describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 Very Good reputation (+4) >> describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Excellent reputation (+5) >> >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -1.772 0.001 -1.772 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 -1.000 0.001 -1.000 >> __________________________________________________ > > Thats probably the QA system that scores that based on the available > corpus data ..
so received nightly with sa-update? >> i changed that in "local.cf" to the following >> >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -0.5 0.001 -0.5 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 -0.8 0.001 -0.8 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 -1.1 0.001 -1.1 >> score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 -1.5 0.001 -1.5 > > That's the expected scoring distribution. We have in our system a more > generous scoring ranging from -0.5 to -3.5 -3.5 is very much - i saw many crap from even H5 listed servers they may lose that reputation as follow up but too late
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
