On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > something is here terrible wrong > > why does "average" is preferred over "excellent" > why do H3 and H4 get a very less WL score? > recently a clear spam message slipped by the -1.7 through > > describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 Average reputation (+2) > describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 Good reputation (+3) > describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 Very Good reputation (+4) > describe RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 Excellent reputation (+5) > > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -1.772 0.001 -1.772 > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010 > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 -0.010 0.001 -0.010 > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 -1.000 0.001 -1.000 > __________________________________________________
Thats probably the QA system that scores that based on the available corpus data .. > i changed that in "local.cf" to the following > > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 0.001 -0.5 0.001 -0.5 > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 0.001 -0.8 0.001 -0.8 > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 0.001 -1.1 0.001 -1.1 > score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5 0.001 -1.5 0.001 -1.5 > That's the expected scoring distribution. We have in our system a more generous scoring ranging from -0.5 to -3.5
