> On 04 Sep 2014, at 13:56 , Timothy Murphy <gayle...@alice.it> wrote: > > On Thursday, September 04, 2014 11:26:01 AM LuKreme wrote: > >>> Is there a simple check to make sure salearn is working? >>> (I get the message that "192 messages have been examined", >>> and ~/.spamassassin/bayes_seen and bayes_tok are pretty large, >>> 300kB and 5MB.) > >> For the record, using sql for babes is considerably faster. > > Do you mean using SQL in some way would speed up salearn?
More importantly, it speeds up the bayes checks on incoming spam. -- "you'd think you could trust a horde of hungarian barbarians"
