> On 04 Sep 2014, at 05:32 , Timothy Murphy <gayle...@alice.it> wrote: > > 1) Is there a simple way of dumping email with an empty To: header? > This seems invariably to be spam, and I'm surprised SA doesn't seem > to score it highly.
You may be surprised if you actually check spam and ham. > 2) Does "autolearn" actually remove spam with a very high score? > Or does it still get marked as spam by SA and passed on? SA never removes mail under any circumstances. > Is there a simple check to make sure salearn is working? > (I get the message that "192 messages have been examined", > and ~/.spamassassin/bayes_seen and bayes_tok are pretty large, > 300kB and 5MB.) For the record, using sql for babes is considerably faster. > 4) I haven't found a short and simple SA tutorial, > explaining how SA works, > with a few tests that one might add to the default, > and a couple of checks one could try to make sure it is working. If you see X-Spam headers, it’s working. If in the X-Spam-Report you see BAYES_ then that is working. -- she [Esk] was already learning that if you ignore the rules people will, half the time, quietly rewrite them so they don't apply to you. --Equal Rites
