On 9/4/2014 2:18 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, jdow wrote:
On 2014-09-04 10:51, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, LuKreme wrote:
> For the record, using sql for babes is considerably faster.
Is that anything like "SQL for Dummies"?
John, I was wondering if there was an SQL for boys, too.
SQL for Jocks, maybe?
I gotta wonder how LuKreme developed *that* particular finger-macro... :)
His new website development work to replace facebook?
Select * from babes where interested in me = 'true';
0 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Just to continue the silliness...
Regards,
KAM
