On Sun, 10 Aug 2014 08:07:25 -0700 "Andy" <a...@opticaltoys.com> wrote:
> I dunno. Anyway, again, I was more curious to anyone's reaction about > how they view SA. I guess it's clear that they COULD manage it better > but they're refusing to do so. Maintaining an effective spam filter is a lot of work. If LunarPages does not specialize in that (or at least have a group who specializes in it) it's almost certainly not cost-effective for them to bother. It's much cheaper to outsource it to a commercial anti-spam filtering company or simply ignore users' spam complaints. I don't think there's much point in your posting on the SpamAssassin list unless you want to and are able to control your own SpamAssassin installation and are willing to put in the time required to maintain its effectiveness. Regards, David.
