On 05/01/2013 03:15 PM, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 03:02 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/1/2013 8:17 AM, Axb wrote:
On 05/01/2013 01:24 PM, doneshlaher wrote:
Hello All,
I am Donesh Laher and I work as a Cyber Security Analyst in the Abuse
Team
at .PW Registry.
We are aware of the recent spam outbreak from the .PW domain names
and have
already started taking actions against the abusive domain names that
have
been reported to us.
We request you all to report us with the domain names which are
involved in
any abusive activities, along with an appropriate evidence for the
same.
We have a dedicated abuse desk which operates 24/7.
Kindly report all the complaints at abuse.al...@registry.pw and CC to
abuse.al...@directi.com.
Upon receiving the domain name, we will take stringent actions
against them.
whois freshtimesfor.pw
This TLD has no whois server.
WTF? can't afford a WHOIS server?
isn't this against ICANN rules?
http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/whois
I don't show the issue:
whois freshtimesfor.pw
[Querying whois.nic.pw]
[whois.nic.pw]
ACK:
bug in WHOIS version
_______
whois --version
Version 5.0.20.
Report bugs to <md+wh...@linux.it>.
______
jwhois version 4.0 handles ok.
Following up on this, just in case someone else gets no .pw whois data.
This may affect Ubuntu/Debian flavours using Marco D'Itri's whois binaries.
Source files :
tld_serv_list
replace:
.pw # http://www.pwregistry.pw/
with
.pw whois.nic.pw
recompile /install
tested this with latest source
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/w/whois/whois_5.0.24.tar.xz
CC: Marco, please correct me if there's a better way to do this.
Axb
