On 2013/01/11 10:45, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 1/11/2013 1:10 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 1/10/2013 8:46 PM, jdow wrote:
I'd suggest an option similar to the header option.
pass_errors 5,18,21,2,6
ignore_errors 23,3,19
Spamc currently has no options file currently so this is a big change that
someone will need to open a bug and likely spearhead with some draft patches.
Otherwise, I haven't yet seen the value of this overhaul.
how about:
spamc --pass_errors "5,18,21,2,6" -ignore_errors "23,3,19" ...
?
Perhaps but shouldn't it tie into EX_TOOBIG and not a number?
I think this has merit especially if we can say:
used to use -x? Use --pass_errors="EX_.., EX_..." and give examples of old to
new.
regards,
KAM
Just off hand I figure it ought to take both so you don't need to
carry a translation table in your head. The "kill" command is a good
model for this.
{^_^}
