On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, John Hardin wrote:

On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:

 On 1/10/2013 8:46 PM, jdow wrote:
>   I'd suggest an option similar to the header option.
> > pass_errors 5,18,21,2,6
>   ignore_errors    23,3,19

 Spamc currently has no options file currently so this is a big change that
 someone will need to open a bug and likely spearhead with some draft
 patches. Otherwise, I haven't yet seen the value of this overhaul.

how about:

  spamc --pass_errors "5,18,21,2,6" -ignore_errors "23,3,19" ...

Oops:

   spamc --pass_errors "5,18,21,2,6" --ignore_errors "23,3,19" ...

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Maxim IV: Close air support covereth a multitude of sins.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 6 days until Benjamin Franklin's 307th Birthday

Reply via email to