Re: Anyone from ReturnPath want to deal with this

[Kevin A. McGrail]

On 9/5/2012 5:19 PM, Axb wrote: On 09/05/2012 11:07 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: describe RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED   Sender is in Return Path Certified (trusted relay) - Questions/Concerns/Abuse? cert...@returnpath.net describe RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE   Sender is in Return Path Safe (trusted relay) - Questions/Concerns/Abuse? safe...@returnpath.net describe RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL       Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ and btw: Why don't THEY add the headers instead of having SA give away cycles for something 99% don't ever use or see ? I don't understand this question.  How would a third party DNS-based lookup add headers? Now if SA devs think this is absolutely necessary (I don't): Must those descriptions be so long? I'm open to changes hence my three or so emails asking for recommended verbiage ;-) RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED   Return Path Certified Sender - Contact:cert...@returnpath.net RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE  Return Path Safe Sender -  Contact:safe...@returnpath.net Would be less obtrussive and not break reports so badly OK if you think that is enough information. Perhaps a landing page to an SA wiki and then use that to clarify things more like we did for DNSWL's? Regards, KAM -- Kevin A. McGrail President Peregrine Computer Consultants Corporation 3927 Old Lee Highway, Suite 102-C Fairfax, VA 22030-2422 http://www.pccc.com/ 703-359-9700 x50 / 800-823-8402 (Toll-Free) 703-359-8451 (fax) kmcgr...@pccc.com