On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 9/5/2012 12:16 PM, Tom Bartel wrote:
> From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Tom Bartel wrote:
>
> > Much appreciated Ned, thank you. Again, sorry for delayed response.
> > Any suggestions at any time, we're all ears.
>
> ...put the RP contact address into the RP rule description? Granted
> this won't help much if the brief rule hits report format is used for
> ham.
If something like that is feasible, we could provide a unique address -
e.g. cert...@returnpath.net
To be clear, are we talking about adding something to these description(s)?
describe RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Sender is in Return Path Certified (trusted
relay)
describe RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE Sender is in Return Path Safe (trusted relay)
describe RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
That's what I had in mind, yes. If the verbose hits format is enabled for
ham, then you can look at the headers in a FN and see where to report it
to RP.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Windows Vista: Windows ME for the XP generation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
12 days until the 225th anniversary of the signing of the U.S. Constitution
