On 09/05/2012 11:07 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
describe RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Sender is in Return Path Certified
(trusted relay) - Questions/Concerns/Abuse? cert...@returnpath.net
describe RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE Sender is in Return Path Safe (trusted relay)
- Questions/Concerns/Abuse? safe...@returnpath.net
describe RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
and btw:
Why don't THEY add the headers instead of having SA give away cycles for
something 99% don't ever use or see ?
Now if SA devs think this is absolutely necessary (I don't):
Must those descriptions be so long?
RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED Return Path Certified Sender -
Contact:cert...@returnpath.net
RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE Return Path Safe Sender - Contact:safe...@returnpath.net
Would be less obtrussive and not break reports so badly
Axb
