On 12/6/2011 3:11 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:45:49 -0500
"Kevin A. McGrail"<kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
I'm not very familiar with sa-update, but perhaps it should have
seperate channels similar to Debian's "stable" and "testing"
releases. A new DNSBL (IMO) would definitely be a "testing"
release. End-users could then subscribe to whichever channel
suited their risk profiles.
-1 unless someone is going to volunteer to set it up.
Is there much to set up? sa-update already has a --channel argument.
It seems to me all you need to do is put new DNSBLs in a testing
channel. People who want them could include
"--channel testing.updates.spamassassin.org" or whatever in their
sa-update invocation.
Am I missing something important?
The masscheck portion of preparing the rules for publishing.
