On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:45:49 -0500 "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
> >> I'm not very familiar with sa-update, but perhaps it should have > >> seperate channels similar to Debian's "stable" and "testing" > >> releases. A new DNSBL (IMO) would definitely be a "testing" > >> release. End-users could then subscribe to whichever channel > >> suited their risk profiles. > -1 unless someone is going to volunteer to set it up. Is there much to set up? sa-update already has a --channel argument. It seems to me all you need to do is put new DNSBLs in a testing channel. People who want them could include "--channel testing.updates.spamassassin.org" or whatever in their sa-update invocation. Am I missing something important? Regards, David.
