On 12/5/11 10:32 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 16:27:23 -0500
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I asked in the bug how people felt about posting to the users list
about it. I got no objections.
The complete lack of responses from anybody but you in the last 4 days
seems to be a loud and clear indication that nobody cares, and we
should go ahead with adding this useful blacklist.
Ah... I didn't object because I don't use sa-update. Nevertheless, if
I did use sa-update, I think I'd find the addition of a new DNSBL
slightly disconcerting.
I'm not very familiar with sa-update, but perhaps it should have
seperate channels similar to Debian's "stable" and "testing" releases.
A new DNSBL (IMO) would definitely be a "testing" release. End-users
could then subscribe to whichever channel suited their risk profiles.
+1
BTW, I do use sa-update for one of my installations.
/rolf
