P.S: In my case all tests done in same input, but outputs have
different scores.

Does not spamd 3.3.1 (JAM) support logging? I want to log some info...

My recent scores on same input : )

OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.7 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.7 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

RESTARTED
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.8 required=6.3
tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

OK
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.8 required=6.3
tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

OK
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.8 required=6.3
tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.7 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.7 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,

OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.7 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,






On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
<uh...@fantomas.sk>wrote:

> On 14.07.10 15:42, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> > I run SA Win32 port 3.3.1 by JAM Software on Windows Server 2008 64 bit.
> > Spamassassin.exe always calculates the same score, coz User_Prefs file is
> > under my docs (C:\Users\ea\.spamassassin)
> >
> > However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the right score at
> > first time then score goes very low at subsequent checks.
>
> [...]
> These are only seen after first erun:
>
> > MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,
> > RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML,T_SURBL_MULTI1,
> > T_SURBL_MULTI2,T_SURBL_MULTI3,T_SURBL_MULTI4,T_URIBL_BLACK_OVERLAP,
> > URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,
> > URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=unavailable
> version=3.3.1
>
> MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID indicate that the message was received without the
> Date: and Message-Id: headers. Some MTA's tend to add the, which causes SA
> checking to be less effective
>
> I have already bugged debian's sendmail not to add To: header if there's
> none, the same reason. We could do the same for those headers if sendmail
> can (not to) do that.
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
>

Reply via email to