On 14.07.10 15:42, Emin Akbulut wrote: > I run SA Win32 port 3.3.1 by JAM Software on Windows Server 2008 64 bit. > Spamassassin.exe always calculates the same score, coz User_Prefs file is > under my docs (C:\Users\ea\.spamassassin) > > However spamd.exe -which runs as service- calculates the right score at > first time then score goes very low at subsequent checks.
[...] These are only seen after first erun: > MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT, > RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML,T_SURBL_MULTI1, > T_SURBL_MULTI2,T_SURBL_MULTI3,T_SURBL_MULTI4,T_URIBL_BLACK_OVERLAP, > URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL, > URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 MISSING_DATE,MISSING_MID indicate that the message was received without the Date: and Message-Id: headers. Some MTA's tend to add the, which causes SA checking to be less effective I have already bugged debian's sendmail not to add To: header if there's none, the same reason. We could do the same for those headers if sendmail can (not to) do that. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.
