I've used SA/spamd.exe for a while because it calculates very high scores on
spams.
-I thought-
Then spams have appeared in people's inboxes and I needed to examine.
I've used another batch file to log spamd spam scores.
The commandline is:
C:\NET\SpamAssassinWin32-EX\winspamc.exe
< C:\NET\SpamAssassinWin32-EX\realspam3.txt
| Find "X-Spam-Status:"
>> recover.log
I ran the same command in a few seconds. Here are the newest results:
16.07.2010, 12:07:48
RESTARTED
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
16.07.2010, 12:08:13
OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
16.07.2010, 12:08:21
OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.6 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
16.07.2010, 12:09:44
OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.5 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
16.07.2010, 12:09:57
OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.5 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
16.07.2010, 12:10:00
OK
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=24.4 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
16.07.2010, 12:10:13
OK
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.5 required=6.3 tests=HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
OK means SA is alive, RESTARTED means spamd.exe crashed
or port 783 non-responsive & restarted.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Charles Gregory <cgreg...@hwcn.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Emin Akbulut wrote:
>
>> spamassassin.exe always calculates the same/correct score.
>>
>
> Good... Goood.....
>
>
> pamd second run reports only a few tests. Is it OK? I mean spamd runs all
>> test but only adds which one increases score to it's report? Or these tests
>> are processed tests list only? First run has tons of tests, second run has
>> only 5 tests.
>>
>
> I am presuming, by your description that the exact same *unmodified* file
> is passing through spamc/spamd all three times, and that there are no other
> variables. The spamc calls are literalyl one after the other, with no change
> of userid or other change that would possibly lead toa different set of
> configuration files being read.
>
> So this means that it is spamd itself that is 'different' on the second
> execution. You are going to need to enable verbose logging for spamd and do
> these three tests and see what messages appear in the logs (presumably)
> showing a failure to load config files on the second run.
>
> Is it possiblt that the file LOCKING on your system prevents spamd from
> accessing certain files under certain circumstances?
>
> What happens if you run ANY other messaeg through spamc as the 'second'
> run, and then run the third one on the orignial file? Is spamd sensitie to
> it being the same messaeg or just messes up on 8whatever* the second message
> would happen to be? Timing or content?
>
> - C
>
