Hello Andy Dills, Am 2010-06-12 10:09:03, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > That's why I'm asking how the limits are designed. In the past I had > problems a certain other blacklist wanting money. We were using a central > resolver. Their thresholds were based on queries per IP, not network. > > Using a central resolver put us over their threshold. Distributing out to > the individual servers put us under their threshold. I pointed out the > silliness of this, as it actually increased overall traffic,
Ehm, I get per day arround 60.000 legitimate messages and around 15 mio
spams using 8 inbound servers and do not exceed the limit of Spamhaus
using a central caching DNS... How can this be?
> but they
> weren't interested in my opinion, just my money. I would prefer to just
> rsync the data, resolve it locally and save everybody the hassle. But
> nooooo, that costs even more! Because remember, this isn't about defraying
> costs (reasonable), this is about generating revenue (reasonable, but not
> for a default-enabled option in free software).
Sorry, but you must have a weird setup...
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ######################
Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux
itsyst...@tdnet France EURL itsyst...@tdnet UG (limited liability)
Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack
Apt. 917 (homeoffice)
50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17
67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany
Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil
Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix
<http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.flexray4linux.org/>
<http://www.debian.tamay-dogan.net/> <http://www.can4linux.org/>
Jabber linux4miche...@jabber.ccc.de
ICQ #328449886
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
