On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:33:31 +0100 Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.org> wrote:
> On fre 18 dec 2009 10:23:48 CET, Christian Brel wrote > > >> If you like you can transparently disable the DNSWLs. > > I found it much more useful to apply them as blocklists and give > > the a +4/+8 myself - but that's a personal choice. > > and "No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL" is also a > personal choice ? > For what I am doing, yes ;-) -- This e-mail and any attachments may form pure opinion and may not have any factual foundation. Please check any details provided to satisfy yourself as to suitability or accuracy of any information provided. Data Protection: Unless otherwise requested we may pass the information you have provided to other partner organisations.
