On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:12:06 -0800 (PST) John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Christian Brel wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:29:56 -0700 > > LuKreme <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > > > >> I might agree with some small portion of our resident troll's > >> posts, > > > > You need to resort to abuse for what particular reason? > > Repeatedly accusing the SA developers of fraudulent collusion is > abusive. Don't be surprised if people are abusive in return. > That is your choice of words - not mine. It is interesting that when reasonable questions about the motivation for a bizarre part of SA is brought up, others are entitled to abuse the person with that point of view - but he must not respond to that abuse or runs the risk of the mob ganging up. It seems that *some* can alter subject lines to abuse, send abusive off-list mail, openly abuse etc, whilst others just have to sit and take it. When they are not happy to do that they are accused of trolling. Strikes me as cyber-bulling, but I've no intention of rising to it - it's all rather boring. -- This e-mail and any attachments may form pure opinion and may not have any factual foundation. Please check any details provided to satisfy yourself as to suitability or accuracy of any information provided. Data Protection: Unless otherwise requested we may pass the information you have provided to other partner organisations.
