On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Christian Brel wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 06:49:41 -0600
Daniel J McDonald <dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 08:49 +0000, Christian Brel wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 03:44:32 -0500
"Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <spamassas...@dostech.ca> wrote:
Please stop beating the -4 and -8 horse. We agree.
Then fix it and show who really is in charge of this project?
It's been fixed. Don't you know how to use bugzilla?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/50_scores.cf?r1=891460&r2=891459&pathrev=891460
The new scores will come out in 3.3.0, RC1 is very soon...
+score RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED 0.0 -3.0 0.0 -3.0
+score RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE 0.0 -2.0 0.0 -2.0
This is 'fixed'?
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, yes.
If it's that big a problem for you in real life, then you should be able
to provide FNs to the masscheck corpora that will _prove_ these scores are
too generous.
We understand your philosophical objection. Providing hard evidence of FNs
will go much further towards making your point than name calling will.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never
does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here."
-- Peter da Silva in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
7 days until Christmas
